« BSG | Main | Wood on Houellebecq »

John Freeman´s Experiments

John Freeman reviewing Only Revolutions:

The stunning lack of experimentation in American fiction during the past two decades partly explains why [Mark Z. Danielewski´s] 2000 debut, "House of Leaves," felt like a lightning bolt, even if some of its wattage was borrowed from other inventors. In an atmosphere of unquestioned realism, it challenged readers to keep track of a book within a book within a book, to sort out false stories from real ones, and to bend the laws of geometry.

Ummm, hell-fucking-lo? Stunning lack of experimentation in American fiction in the past 20 years? John, you´ve been reading The New York Times too much, amigo. Here´s a few titles to check out.

Infinite Jest, David Foster Wallace
Underworld, Don DeLillo
The Gold Bug Variations, Richard Powers
The Intuitionist, Colson Whitehead
   John Henry Days
The Puttermesser Papers, Cynthia Ozick
The Tunnel, William Gass
CivilWarLand in Bad Decline, George Saunders
The Corrections, Jonathan Franzen
A Frolic of His Own, William Gaddis
Reader's Block, David Markson
   Wittgenstein´s Mistress
Multiple books by Vollmann
Multiple books by Scott Erickson

Not to mention, so putting your text at 45 degree angles now passes for literary experimentalism? News to me. Oh, a book within a book! How clever! Sort out false stories from real ones? Whoa!

Someone should send Freeman copies of Sorrentino´s library.

Oh, and also, House of Leaves was a thunderbolt? Again, news to me.

Can we get reviewers that don´t make assinine statements?

For the first 40 pages, it's nearly impossible to make heads or tails of what in the world these two are going on about, no matter which way you flip the book. While "House of Leaves" pushed the boundaries of genre and narrative, it pretty much left language alone, content to mimic and spoof the style of horror and academic genres.

"Only Revolutions" is, as its title promises, a true revolution - it wants to overthrow not just how we read, but what we read. Ever see "Sunnysurrounded" or "butterboys" or "viatotopolis" in the dictionary?

When did runningwordstogether become playing with language? Anyone can invent words and stick them in a book. Anyone can write 40 pages worth of shit that doesn´t make sense.

No, never mind. We´re anointing Mark Z. Danielewski the NEXTBIGTHING (see, I´m experimenting!).

Comments


Since 2005, an online magazine of book reviews, interviews, and essays
"If it were a print publication, I would definitely buy it at the newsstand." — Scott McLemee, National Book Critics Circle Board of Directors
• "A literary juggernaut." — Annalee Newitz, io9


Get Conversational Reading on the Kindle

Support Indie Literary Coverage


Get the Amazon Kindle

Visit Powells.com

Subscribe via email:

Delivered by FeedBurner





Categories

Guests

Christopher Miller, author of The Cardboard Universe: Five of Christopher Miller's Favorite Books About Imaginary Authors
Joshua Henkin, author of Matrimony: Joshua Henkin's Ten Terrific Novels About Writers, Writing, and the Writing Life, Writing About Writing
Christina Thompson, editor of Harvard Review: How Many Times Must an Author Write the Same Book?
Neus Arqués, author of Un hombre de Pago: On Translations or the Pursuit of the Domino Effect
Jennifer Epstein, author of The Painter from Shanghai: Rewriting Motherhood: Why Career and Home Do Balance (at Least, for Me)


cover